Development and pre-evaluation of a “DiagNurse” mobile app to support nurses in clinical diagnosis using the ADDIE model

0
Development and pre-evaluation of a “DiagNurse” mobile app to support nurses in clinical diagnosis using the ADDIE model
  • Wilson, K. Mobile cell phone technology puts the future of health care in our hands. CMAJ 190 (13), E378–E379 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamińska, D., Zwoliński, G. & Laska-Leśniewicz, A. Usability testing of virtual reality applications-the pilot study. Sens. (Basel). 22 (4), 1342 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, R. M. et al. What makes a good health ‘app’? Identifying the strengths and limitations of existing mobile application evaluation tools. Nurs. Inq. 27(2), e12333 (2020).

  • IQVIA. IQVIA institute for human data science study. Impact of digital health grows as innovation, evidence and adoption of mobile health apps accelerate. accessed Jan 10 (2024). https://www.iqvia.com/newsroom/2017/11/impact-of-digital-health-grows-as-innovation-evidence-and-adoption-of-mobile-health-apps-accelerate

  • Nezamdoust, S., Abdekhoda, M. & Rahmani, A. Determinant factors in adopting mobile health application in healthcare by nurses. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 22 (1), 47 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler-Ruwisch, J. & Peters, A. Mobile applications for emerging adults transitioning to independent diabetes monitoring. Inf. Health Soc. Care. 46 (1), 56–67 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Negreiros, F. D. D. S. et al. E-MunDiabetes: a mobile application for nursing students on diabetes education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput. Inf. Nurs. 40 (5), 325–334 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adu, M. D., Malabu, U. H., Callander, E. J., Malau-Aduli, A. E. & Malau-Aduli, B. S. Considerations for the development of mobile phone apps to support diabetes self-management: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 6 (6), e10115 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaid, B., Jamaludin, R. & Wafaa, B. A comparative study of usability methods for mobile applications. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 3 (8), 1–4 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach, G. The law of attrition. J. Med. Internet Res. 7 (1), e11 (2005).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, L. A. & McLaughlin, A. C. Identifying usability problems of blood glucose tracking apps for older adult users. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 56(1), 115–119 (2012). (2012).

  • Lai, C. Y. & Wu, C. C. Promoting nursing students’ clinical learning through a mobile e-portfolio. Comput. Inf. Nurs. 34 (11), 535–543 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann-Price, R. A., Kennedy, L. D. & Godwin, C. Use of personal phones by senior nursing students to access health care information during clinical education: staff nurses’ and students’ perceptions. J. Nurs. Educ. 51 (11), 642–646 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, P. E., Petersson, G. I. & Nilsson, G. C. Nursing students’ experience of using a personal digital assistant (PDA) in clinical practice – an intervention study. Nurse Educ. Today. 33 (10), 1246–1251 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallegos, C., Gehrke, P. & Nakashima, H. Can mobile devices be used as an active learning strategy? Student perceptions of mobile device use in a nursing course. Nurse Educ. 44 (5), 270–274 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, S. & Andrews, T. Smartphones and mobile applications (apps) in clinical nursing education: a student perspective. Nurse Educ. Today. 69, 172–178 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Min, H., Oh, S. M. & Shim, K. Mobile technology in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review. Healthc. Inf. Res. 24 (2), 97–108 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallegos, C. & Nakashima, H. Mobile devices: a distraction, or a useful tool to engage nursing students? J. Nurs. Educ. 57 (3), 170–173 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennessey, A. & Wittmann-Price, R. A. Physical assessment: a continuing need for clarification. Nurs. Forum. 46 (1), 45–50 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Birks, M., Cant, R., James, A., Chung, C. & Davis, J. The use of physical assessment skills by registered nurses in Australia: issues for nursing education. Collegian 20 (1), 27–33 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohtz, C., Brown, S. C., Williams, R. & O’Connor, P. A. Physical assessment techniques in nursing education: a replicated study. J. Nurs. Educ. 56 (5), 287–291 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cierzniakowska, K., Popow, A., Kozłowska, E. & Kubiak, J. Performing physical examinations in the field of nursing competence. Leczenie Ran. 18 (1), 1–7 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobart, J. C. & Thompson, A. J. Assessment measures and clinical scales. In: Clinical Trials in Neurology (ed (ed Guiloff, R. J.) 17–28 (Springer, (2001).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortney, J. C. et al. A tipping point for measurement-based care. Psychiatr Serv. 68 (2), 179–188 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardarelli, R., Virgilio, R. F. & Taylor, L. Evidence-based medicine, part 2. An introduction to critical appraisal of articles on therapy. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 107 (8), 299–303 (2007).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Drljača, D., Latinović, B., Stanković, Z. & Cvetković D. ADDIE model for development of e-courses. In: Documento procedente de la International Scientific Conference on Information Technology and Data Related Research SINTEZA, 242–247 (2017). (accessed 10 Jan 2024).

  • Hess, A. N. & Greer, K. Designing for engagement: using the ADDIE model to integrate high-impact practices into an online information literacy course. Commun. Inf. Lit. 10 (2), 264–282 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muruganantham, G. Developing of e-content package by using ADDIE model. Int. J. Appl. Res. 1 (3), 52–54 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, L., Bellucci, E. & Nguyen, L. T. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. Int. J. Med. Inf. 83 (11), 779–796 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baysari, M. T. & Westbrook, J. I. Mobile applications for patient-centered care coordination: a review of human factors methods applied to their design, development, and evaluation. Yearb Med. Inf. 10 (1), 47–54 (2015).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation of the Minister of Health of February 28. 2017 on the type and scope of preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitation services provided by a nurse or midwife independently without a doctor’s order (Dz.U. 2017 poz. 497) accessed Jan 10 (2024). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20170000497

  • Tien, T. et al. Eye tracking for skills assessment and training: a systematic review. J. Surg. Res. 191 (1), 169–178 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R. L. A practical guide to focus-group research. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 30 (3), 463–475 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3 (2), 77–101 (2006). (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., Naturalistic Inquiry & SAGE. (, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1985; pp. 221–381. (1985).

  • Borkowska, A. & Jach, K. Pre-testing of Polish translation of System Usability Scale (SUS). In: Information systems architecture and technology: proceedings of 37th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2016 – Part I. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (eds Borzemski, L., Grzech, A., Świątek, J.& Wilimowska, Z. (eds) 143–153 (Spronger, 2017).

  • Kortum, P. T. & Bangor, A. Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the System Usability Scale. Int. J. Hum Comput Interact. 29 (2), 67–76 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauro, J. & Lewis, J. R. Quantifying the user Experience: Practical Statistics for user Research (Morgan Kaufmann, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berking, P., Archibald, T., Haag, J. & Birtwhistle, M. Mobile learning: not just another delivery method. In: The Inter service/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC). National Training Systems Association (2012).

  • Silva Kde, L., Évora, Y. D. & Cintra, C. S. Software development to support decision making in the selection of nursing diagnoses and interventions for children and adolescents. Rev. Lat Am. Enfermagem. 23 (5), 927–935 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, P. T. C. O. et al. Validation of virtual learning object to support the teaching of nursing care systematization. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 71 (1), 11–19 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. P., Jr, Latulipe, C., Melius, K. A., Quandt, S. A. & Arcury, T. A. Primary care providers’ views of patient portals: interview study of perceived benefits and consequences. J. Med. Internet Res. 18 (1), e8 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcinkaya, T. & Yucel, C. Determination of nursing students’ attitudes toward and readiness for mobile learning: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ. Today. 120, 105652 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkütük, N., Orgun, F. & Baysan, A. The readiness of nursing students for mobile learning: a cross-sectional study. Contemp. Nurse. 57 (3–4), 202–212 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan, M. R., Kwon, M., Park, E. & Jungquist, C. Nurses’ experience and perception of technology use in practice: a qualitative study using an extended technology acceptance model. Comput. Inf. Nurs. 40 (7), 478–486 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, S., Nielsen, J. B., Aldahmash, A. M., Qadri, F. R. & Leppin, A. Willingness to use digital health tools in patient care among health care professionals and students at a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia: quantitative cross-sectional survey. JMIR Med. Educ. 7 (1), e18590 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, A. & Broekhuis, M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv. Res. 10, 231 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, J. A., Woltjer, H. & Kool, R. B. Identification of factors influencing the adoption of health information technology by nurses who are digitally lagging: in-depth interview study. J. Med. Internet Res. 22 (8), e15630 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew-Maich, N. et al. Designing, implementing, and evaluating mobile health technologies for managing chronic conditions in older adults: a scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 4(2), e29 (2016).

  • Ratwani, R. M., Hettinger, Z., Kosydar, A., Fairbanks, A. & Hodgkins, R. J. A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 24 (e1), e35–e39 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Llorens-Vernet, P. & Miró, J. Standards for mobile health-related apps: systematic review and development of a guide. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8(3), e13057 (2020).

  • Bangor, A., Kortum, P. & Miller, J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4 (3), 114–123 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macefield, R. How to specify the participant group size for usability studies: a practitioner’s guide. J. Usability Stud. 5 (1), 34–45 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *