Design and development of a mobile health intervention for rehabilitation support after knee arthroplasty: TeleRehabilitation after knee ArThroplasty (TReAT) project | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Vaidya SV, Jogani AD, Pachore JA, Armstrong R, Vaidya CS. India joining the world of hip and knee registries: Present Status-A Leap Forward. Indian J Orthop. 2020;55(Suppl 1):46–55.
Google Scholar
Artz N, Elvers KT, Lowe CM, Sackley C, Jepson P, Beswick AD. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:15.
Google Scholar
Wang X, Hunter DJ, Vesentini G, Pozzobon D, Ferreira ML. Technology-assisted rehabilitation following total knee or hip replacement for people with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):506.
Google Scholar
Aseer PAL, Maiya GA, Kumar MM, Vijayaraghavan PV. Content validation of total knee replacement rehabilitation protocol in Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(6):YC05-09.
Google Scholar
Pua YH, Seah FJ, Seet FJ, Tan JW, Liaw JS, Chong HC. Sex differences and impact of body Mass Index on the Time Course of Knee Range of Motion, knee strength, and Gait Speed after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67(10):1397–405.
Google Scholar
Magklara E, Burton CR, Morrison V. Does self-efficacy influence recovery and well-being in osteoarthritis patients undergoing joint replacement? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(9):835–46.
Google Scholar
Buus AAO, Hejlsen OK, Dorisdatter Bjornes C, Laugesen B. Experiences of pre- and postoperative information among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(2):150–62.
Google Scholar
Buhagiar MA, Naylor JM, Simpson G, Harris IA, Kohler F. Understanding consumer and clinician preferences and decision making for rehabilitation following arthroplasty in the private sector. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):415.
Google Scholar
Malik IV, Devasenapathy N, Kumar A, Dogra H, Ray S, Gautam D, et al. Estimation of expenditure and challenges related to rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Indian J Orthop. 2021;55(5):1317–25.
Google Scholar
Pritwani S, Pandey S, Shrivastava P, Kumar A, Malhotra R, Maddison R et al. Challenges in rehabilitation and continuum of care provision after knee replacement: a mixed-methods study from a low- and middle-income country. Disabil Rehabil. 2023:1–11.
Kumar SG, Roy G, Kar SS. Disability and rehabilitation services in India: issues and challenges. J Family Med Prim are. 2012;1(1):69–73.
Google Scholar
Irving G, Neves AL, Dambha-Miller H, Oishi A, Tagashira H, Verho A, et al. International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017902.
Google Scholar
World Health Organisation. mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies. 2011.
Parker SJ, Jessel S, Richardson JE, Reid MC. Older adults are mobile too!Identifying the barriers and facilitators to older adults’ use of mHealth for pain management. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:43.
Google Scholar
PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited CoII. How mHealth can revolutionise the Indian healthcare industry 2017. Available from: https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/publications/2017/how-mhealth-can-revolutionise-the-indian-healthcare-industry.pdf.
Bassi A, John O, Praveen D, Maulik PK, Panda R, Jha V. Current status and future directions of mHealth interventions for health system strengthening in India: systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2018;6(10): e11440.
Google Scholar
Joshi V, Joshi NK, Bhardwaj P, Singh K, Ojha D, Jain YK. The health impact of mHealth interventions in India: systematic review and meta-analysis. Online J Public Health Inf. 2023;15:e50927.
Google Scholar
Pritwani S, Shrivastava P, Pandey S, Kumar A, Malhotra R, Maddison R, et al. Mobile and Computer-based applications for Rehabilitation Monitoring and Self-Management after knee arthroplasty: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024;12: e47843.
Google Scholar
Oatis CA, Li W, DiRusso JM, Hoover MJ, Johnston KK, Butz MK et al. Variations in Delivery and Exercise Content of Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Following Total Knee Replacement Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Observation Study. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;Suppl 5.
Naylor JM, Hart A, Harris IA, Lewin AM. Variation in rehabilitation setting after uncomplicated total knee or hip arthroplasty: a call for evidence-based guidelines. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):214.
Google Scholar
Jansson MM, Rantala A, Miettunen J, Puhto AP, Pikkarainen M. The effects and safety of telerehabilitation in patients with lower-limb joint replacement: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(2):96–114.
Google Scholar
Buhagiar MA, Naylor JM, Harris IA, Xuan W, Adie S, Lewin A. Assessment of outcomes of Inpatient or Clinic-based vs home-based Rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(4):e192810.
Google Scholar
Li D, Yang Z, Kang P, Xie X. Home-based compared with Hospital-Based Rehabilitation Program for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(6):440–7.
Google Scholar
Massip M, de Batlle J, Barbe F, Torres G, Vargiu E, Miralles F, et al. Implementing Mobile Health-Enabled Integrated Care for Complex Chronic patients: patients and professionals’ acceptability study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8(11): e22136.
Google Scholar
Visperas AT, Greene KA, Krebs VE, Klika AK, Piuzzi NS, Higuera-Rueda CA. A web-based interactive patient-provider Software platform does not increase patient satisfaction or decrease hospital resource utilization in total knee and hip arthroplasty patients in a single large hospital system. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(7):2290.
Google Scholar
Correia FD, Nogueira A, Magalhães I, Guimarães J, Moreira M, Barradas I, et al. Medium-term outcomes of digital versus conventional home-based rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: prospective, parallel-group feasibility study. JMIR Rehab Assist Technol. 2019;6(1):e13111.
Google Scholar
Zhang X, Chen X, Kourkoumelis N, Gao R, Li G, Zhu C. A social media–promoted Educational Community of joint replacement patients using the WeChat App: Survey Study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2021;9(3): e18763.
Google Scholar
Jennings HM, Morrison J, Akter K, Kuddus A, Ahmed N, Kumer Shaha S, et al. Developing a theory-driven contextually relevant mHealth intervention. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1): 1550736.
Google Scholar
Voorheis P, Zhao A, Kuluski K, Pham Q, Scott T, Sztur P, et al. Integrating behavioral Science and Design thinking to develop Mobile Health interventions: systematic scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(3): e35799.
Google Scholar
Cole-Lewis H, Ezeanochie N, Turgiss J. Understanding Health Behavior Technology Engagement: pathway to Measuring Digital Behavior Change interventions. JMIR Form Res. 2019;3(4): e14052.
Google Scholar
Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, Use of Behavior Change techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4.
Google Scholar
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061.
Google Scholar
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1): 42.
Google Scholar
Mummah SA, Robinson TN, King AC, Gardner CD, Sutton SIDEAS, Integrate. Design, assess, and share): a Framework and Toolkit of Strategies for the development of more Effective Digital interventions to change Health Behavior. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(12):e317.
Google Scholar
Yardley L, Spring BJ, Riper H, Morrison LG, Crane DH, Curtis K, et al. Understanding and promoting effective Engagement with Digital Behavior Change interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):833–42.
Google Scholar
Devasenapathy N, Maddison R, Malhotra R, Zodepy S, Sharma S, Belavy DL. Preoperative quadriceps muscle strength and functional ability predict performance-based outcomes 6 months after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2019;99(1):46–61.
Google Scholar
Devasenapathy N, Malhotra R, Mittal K, Garg B, Kumar V, Zodpey S, et al. Higher disability in Women Than Men Scheduled for Total Knee Arthroplasty for degenerative osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional analysis from India. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020;2(6):309–19.
Google Scholar
Devasenapathy N, Malhotra R, Garg B, Kumar V, Mittal K, Zodpey S, et al. Trajectories of recovery of disability outcomes after total knee arthroplasty for degenerative osteoarthritis a longitudinal cohort study from India. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020;28:S380.
Google Scholar
Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95.
Google Scholar
Doak CCDL, Root GH. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1996.
Google Scholar
Raghu A, Praveen D, Peiris D, Tarassenko L, Clifford G. Engineering a mobile health tool for resource-poor settings to assess and manage cardiovascular disease risk: SMARThealth study. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2015;15:36.
Google Scholar
Figma. The collaborative interface design tool. Available from: Cited 2023 12 July.
Torrente G, de Souza TQ, Tonaki L, Cardoso AP, Manickchand Junior L, da Silva GO. Scrum Framework and Health Solutions: management and results. Stud Health Technol Inf. 2021;284:290–4.
Nielsen J. 10 usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group. Available from: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/.
Shneiderman B, Plaisant C, Cohen M, Jacobs S, Elmqvist N. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. USA: Pearson Education; 2016.
Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Wilson H. Development and validation of the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(2):e72.
Google Scholar
Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):75.
Google Scholar
Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 1):S17-24.
Google Scholar
Saleh KJ, Mulhall KJ, Bershadsky B, Ghomrawi HM, White LE, Buyea CM, et al. Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(9):1985–94.
Google Scholar
Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Cross MB, Padgett DE. Validation of the KOOS, JR: a short-form knee arthroplasty outcomes Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(6):1461–71.
Google Scholar
Kowatsch T, Otto L, Harperink S, Cotti A, Schlieter H. A design and evaluation framework for digital health interventions. it – Inform Technol. 2019;61(5–6):253–63.
Google Scholar
Doiron-Cadrin P, Kairy D, Vendittoli PA, Lowry V, Poitras S, Desmeules F. Feasibility and preliminary effects of a tele-prehabilitation program and an in-person prehablitation program compared to usual care for total hip or knee arthroplasty candidates: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(7):989–98.
Google Scholar
Gohir SA, Eek F, Kelly A, Abhishek A, Valdes AM. Effectiveness of internet-based exercises aimed at treating knee osteoarthritis: the iBEAT-OA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e210012.
Google Scholar
link
